JayUK said:
Yep its like they only see, what they want to see. If Nintendo produces something new, they choose to ignore it. Its the same for the wonderful 101.IGN:"We need new IPs wah, wah, wah"
nintendo produces some.
IGN:"All nintendo makes is mario"
but...
IGN:"All nintendo makes is mario"
but....
IGN:"ALL NINTENDO MAKES IS MARIO"
IGN Reader: "apparently all nintendo makes is mario"
I've seen a lot of people complain that X wasn't on the ballot for an IGN award, even though it had a full trailer, while games like the next Halo were with just a small non-gameplay teaser.
IGN also started voting for who won E3 before Nintendo even showed anything.
In their summary of Nintendo's E3 they had some weird things to say. Fortunately the commenters didn't play along and stood up to IGN. Just read some of the first comments (the first of which has over 3300 +1's.)
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/12/nintendos-e3-2013-tearing-up-the-rulebook
Spike TV is really bad too. During one interview with Reggie they asked him the same question 2-3 times, trying to prod him into saying yes. Each time he firmly said no. Then two minutes after the interview they were talking about it and said something like "We just talked to Reggie and he said (whatever they wanted him to say yes to)" I seriously couldn't believe it.
That same day they also gave the brilliant suggestion that Nintendo should probably announce a new Wii Fit for Wii U sometime soon.
I always preferred G4's coverage to Spikes, but since G4 basically doesn't exist anymore I decided to watch Spike. But after that I couldn't watch anymore and immediately deleted the rest of my DVR.
( Edited 13.06.2013 22:38 by Sonic_13 )