This is a great game, or at least very under-rated gem, as well.
Exactly. There are so many great games deserving of sequels, but it's not like this one came easily enough, either. It's taken a long time to get this game off the ground, and even then, it's a reboot, not a sequel.
As for the rest, yes, any game with EA behind the name I have serious worries about. The same for me will be Mass Effect Andromeda. It got absolutely terrible with ME3, with the amount of story DLC there was, how the DLC remained full price for what felt like the best part of two years, how they made it so difficult to own the trilogy on PC, how they launched ME3 on Wii U without all DLC and the previous games, how they never made a complete trilogy edition with all DLC (or a remaster, which is more of a peeve of my own because I really want the complete package on my PS4). I think it's clear EA's influence contributes to the ruination of so many games, and while they might say they give the developers their freedom, story DLC in itself is enough to make me fume, especially when it came to locking out some seriously important plot scenarios in ME3 behind a paywall.
So, yes, I, too, am concerned ME Catalyst could be let down by some EA shit practices, but I hope the bulk of it remains so good that we can try to overlook any crap.