By Harold Cuthbert Hound 07.01.2007 9
PWNED(XD)
Very nice hound, a strong comeback! Look forward to the next!
You've kinda taken him out of context there.. he was protesting against kids spending their entire free time in front of the tv playing computer games, not against people of university age playing computer games, and he had a valid point- kids read less now that there are other forms of entertainment, and it does damage literacy. Just because we're gamers doesn't mean we have to dismiss everything said against computer games.
That is really, come on, just a big rant
Good one though, try emailing that to Mr. Johnson, with a big firm TOLDE U SEW in the subject. No, really...
I dunno where I stand here, as I said in the other topic, I think he's aiming this at a quite different range of gamers than us. I vegetate all day in front of my laptop screen figuring out why some stupid object is jumping 5 pixels instead of 4, and yet I'm quite competent enough to write a personal statement which is deemed to be very good. But then again, in my childhood I wasn't really a big gamer. I got my N64 in....1997 or something, which I did play a lot, but was much more active back then, and back when I only had a SNES I was even more active. Now my physical activity pretty much consists of an hour after lunch on a Wednesday. I still wouldn't class myself as being particularly bad though. I'm pretty good at most sports I play, and I eat healthily most of the time, but I think on the generation 4/5 years younger than me, illiteracy due to TV/DVD's/Games could be quite pronounced. As you said though, it's not just games, and picking them out as the sole cause is idiotic.
Oh, and the Tories aren't in government, so it's hardly Boris Johnson's fault if literacy policy isn't working.
It's a blatant case of scape-goat though. You can pick on ANYTHING in terms of modern entertainment and highlight it as a case for illiteracy. It isn't video games; it is a poor education system and poor parenting. Video games don't inherently make you stupid. I wasn't making the case of myself as a university student playing games and being intelligent. I played video games as a child and nothing hideous happened to me. There is no correlation and Johnson is off on TOTALLY the wrong hunt.
Anyone who can complete Twilight Princess is really quite clever.Well I wouldn't say so, but I guess you certainly couldn't complete it if you were a total idiot...
Anyway, ever since I got my Mega Drive/Saturn (I forget which one I actually got first) when I was a kid I'd play games for several hours each day. I didn't even bother playing in moderation, I'd just sit there for hours on end playing Sonic and Nights and some weird racing game I can't remember the name of...
Anyway, I've always been in the top set for everything at school though, got a few As and Bs at GCSE... Isn't the typical geeky/nerdy stereotype that we plays loads of games? Then they say that people who plays lots of games are stupid? I'm certain that it's quite the opposite. Parents should get their kids to play games more damnit >_>
If TV and video games are to blame for falling standards in children's literacy, why are they dumbing them down via the education systems?
It's the higher ups plan to brainwash us all with TV and the internet anyway so why don't these political speakers just leave the subject be?
I don't read books any more, it's more of a chore than a leisure activity to me. I don't think games are making kids more stupid I think more stupid kids are playing games. Until they can find a direct correlation between video games and brain rot they can keep it to themsleves.
To me books are films for deaf people and films are games for people without thumbs.