Critical Hit | Star Fox Zero... Effort?

By Aria DiMezzo 18.04.2016 4

Star Fox Zero has come under fire recently because Nintendo has decided to implement an Invincibility Mode into the core game, which has obviously drawn criticism from the "hardcore crowd," alleging that this "baby mode" hurts the experience. Those who are familiar with my take on such things from my review of Final Fantasy IX on Android will correctly surmise that I'm not a fan of this Invincibility Mode. Why, though, would an optional feature be a problem? Time for another Critical Hit…

First, there is the statement that features such as the "Instant Level 99" button in the most recent Final Fantasy re-releases are optional, and that players can forego their use, which would leave the features having no impact on the experience. On a surface level, this is certainly true, but it must be pointed out that microtransactions in games like Dead Space 3 are also "optional" and that, on the surface, the existence of such features doesn't have any effect on players who pass them up.

On a deeper level, however, this isn't the case; it certainly has an impact. Resigning oneself to skip the White Tanooki Suit of Super Mario 3D World allegedly will have no impact on the experience by simply being there as an option. This is false. Nothing changes whether the player grabs the suit and cheeses through the level, or if the player foregoes the suit and struggles on, finally overcoming the challenge. Nothing changes, but in one scenario the player had an easy time, while in the other the player fought. There is no difference as Mario climbs the flagpole.

In actuality, Super Mario 3D World is a great example of how to do this right, and the preceding paragraph is wrong. Rosalina cannot be unlocked if previous levels were completed with the White Tanooki Suit. When the game is completed, a meaningless sheen will appear on the save file if the suit wasn't used, but that's negligible and far too inconsequential to weigh in. Being rewarded with a new character for passing up on using the suit, for persevering in the face of the challenges, and for struggling and overcoming is more than a sufficient reward for not using the "I Win Button."

Image for Critical Hit | Star Fox Zero... Effort?

Without Rosalina being sealed away from players who simply died repeatedly and 'cheated' their way through with the White Tanooki Suit, there would be no meaningful reward whatsoever for actually playing the game. If Rosalina was available regardless, then there would be no difference between fighting through the stages or simply running off the cliff repeatedly, grabbing the White Tanooki Suit, and simply charging through the level. Players who unlocked Rosalina would have essentially achieved exactly the same thing, which would undermine and erase any sense of accomplishment that would have otherwise come from having unlocked Rosalina.

This is critically important, because the sense of accomplishment is a big part of why we play games, and it's the reason that games like Dark Souls II and Dark Souls III are popular despite being extremely unfriendly toward new players - people want a sense of accomplishment. Two primary things factor into this sense of accomplishment: how easy it is to do, and how many people have done it.

There is no sense of accomplishment in successfully putting on socks in the morning, because that is an easy task, and anyone can do it, yet there is a great sense of accomplishment for those who have knitted their own socks. What is the difference? One is much easier than the other is, and one is done much more frequently than the other is.

Image for Critical Hit | Star Fox Zero... Effort?

In a way, the Invincibility Mode of Star Fox Zero is like a Participation Trophy. Participation trophies are fine, in theory, and aren't a problem in and of themselves. There is only an issue when excellence is not rewarded. When the player who hit seventeen homeruns in the last season received exactly the same award as the player who sat in the grass eating bugs, there is a problem.

Whether we like it or not, and whether it's politically correct or not, striving for excellence must be encouraged, and the best way to encourage people to work hard to improve is to reward excellence. Participation trophies and "I Win Buttons" are not a problem, and it's always good to encourage everyone, to include everyone, and to bolster the self-esteem of everyone involved, but this does not mean that excellence should go overlooked and unrewarded. Pulling away a child who received a participation trophy, pointing at the player who received the larger, shinier Home Run Trophy, and saying, "You see that? If you work hard, that can be you," would go infinitely further than the participation trophy alone.

Unlike many, I trust Nintendo to do the videogame equivalent of this - it did it in Super Mario 3D World, after all, and it has been doing it for thirty years. I remember beating Contra III: The Alien Wars on Normal and reading, in essence, "Congratulations, and good job! But… if you try harder, we have something else to give you." I had played the game, and I had enjoyed the game. Knowing that something else awaited me for completing the game on Hard encouraged me further to try again, to improve, to further enjoy the game, and to overcome the challenges.

Image for Critical Hit | Star Fox Zero... Effort?

When I do the Level 1 Challenge in Final Fantasy IX, I'm fully aware that bragging rights are the only reward, because that is the nature of self-imposed challenges. They are undertaken solely for one's own sense of accomplishment and it is expected that the game will neither notice nor care that the player is handicapped. However, the implementation of Invincibility Modes fundamentally changes the game as a whole, and it renders "simply playing the game normally" as a self-imposed challenge. Just playing becomes a self-imposed challenge and, as is the case with all self-imposed challenges, there is no real reason to undergo it but bragging rights. In order for someone to undertake such a task, however, the bragging rights must be substantial.

"Ooh, you beat Final Fantasy IX without using the Instant Level 99 feature. Woo-hoo."

Exactly. Final Fantasy IX isn't hard in the first place - most JRPGs aren't. When they are difficult, it's usually toward the very beginning of the game, leading to easier gameplay as progress is made. Why bother, then, to play through the Android re-release normally? The difficulty difference is negligible, so the self-imposed challenge offers no bragging rights, and anyone who wants a self-imposed challenge would likely go for the Level 1 Challenge. Why bother at all?

However, the Easy Mode itself is not a problem, nor is it a problem when it's taken to slippery slope degrees and turned into a "Can't Lose Mode." The existence of such a mode has no direct effect on the experience, after all. The issue, as stated, is the lack of rewards for those who choose not to use the mode. Self-imposed challenges aren't supposed to offer in-game rewards; it's in the name and is what makes them self-imposed. When we turn "simply playing the game normally" into a self-imposed challenge, though, something is wrong.

Image for Critical Hit | Star Fox Zero... Effort?

It's important to offer people rewards for doing better. In fact, there may be nothing on the planet more important. The reality faced is that videogames are a huge part of the culture, and their increasing ubiquity in the world means that they have profound and subtle influences on our behavior. It's a slippery slope to say that Doom causes people to go on killing sprees, but multitudes of evidence supports the notion that videogames do affect us in subtle ways.

A bass player in a former rock band I was in happened to have a vehicle that dinged obnoxiously and incessantly if the driver seat was occupied but the seatbelt wasn't fastened. After only a few weeks of owning the vehicle, his behavior had changed; before even cranking a vehicle, he would fasten the seatbelt. He had been trained, conditioned. A system of reward and punishment had affected him in the most subtle of ways: in order to stop the noise, he fastened his seatbelt. The punishment of hearing the noise for not fastening his seatbelt subconsciously trained him to always wear it. It's scary to think of and acknowledge, but we are all being conditioned like this, and being unaware of it makes it more likely to be successful.

The conclusion is inescapable: failing to reward those who strive for excellence can have the side effect of eliminating the desire to strive for excellence. Videogames have a responsibility to humanity to do what is right and what is best, and it is certainly in humanity's best interest to have people striving for excellence. The best way to achieve this is to offer rewards to those who do.

This isn't to say that people have to be excluded from the fun, told that they suck, or punished for simply wanting to enjoy the game without worrying about failing. They should certainly be rewarded for completing the game, regardless of the difficulty - they should get the participation trophy. However, there should also be a reward for those who struggle, work hard, and excel. Concerning Star Fox Zero, this could be achieved by restricting the player to the default/easy path (assuming the game keeps the path mechanics of previous entries) when Invincibility Mode is used; games have been doing similar things for decades. We just have to be vigilant and ensure that they keep doing so, rather than letting them take the Final Fantasy IX route of turning the game itself into a self-imposed challenge.

Comment on this article

You can comment as a guest or join the Cubed3 community below: Sign Up for Free Account Login

Preview PostPreview Post Your Name:
Validate your comment
  Enter the letters in the image to validate your comment.
Submit Post


Guest 19.04.2016#1

I disagree. Having an optional easy mode really has zero effect on the experience. It can only improve it. Hardcore gamers, simply won't use it. Yoshis wooly world and fire emblem both have modes that completely remove any challenge. Did i ever feel the need to use them, no because i like a challenge. Do i need a biscuit and a pat on the head for playing a game on a difficulty level suited to my abilities. No not really. It should be about the journey not the destination. The credits and unlockable extras are nice to see, but if only twenty percent of the gaming populace get there whats the point. I personally play bioshock, mass effect and fallout on the easiest difficulty. I'd find it incredibly annoying if i found out significant rewards were hidden behind a tedious difficulty that sucked any enjoyment i had out of the game

As long as it's always optional (which it has been every time I've seen these sorts of options added to games) then I have no problem with it and I personally think it's a good thing. Like Guest mentioned above, Wolly World is a fantastic example! It had a tonne of badges you could pick from that helped you, from small things such as bigger wool balls to actually skipping a whole level completely. I actually used these a few times to help me out on some of the harder levels and even skipped a whole stage completely because of how obnoxious it was.

Had it not been for the badges, I might never of experienced that game fully. Videogames are the only form of media that lock you out of experiencing the whole thing, unless you're good enough to get through. Books, films, music, it's all there from the start to enjoy. So I think it's a nice thing that with these sort of optional aids, it can makes a game purchase feel more worthwhile. There's a number of decent games I will never buy or play because they don't have an easy mode.

Having difficulty options is one of the best features any videogame. I wish they all had it or at least the super challenging ones!

( Edited 20.04.2016 12:16 by Marzy )

Our member of the week

I... don't know where to stand on the topic of difficulty. Because while I like a challenge, sometimes I get simply disgusted from a game and don't want to touch it again if it's unfair. So having en easier option is necessary for me, and always welcome. But at the same time, when it's there, even if it's optional, it gives people an excuse to not try harder either, and not hone their skills.

In my opinion the best example of difficulty made right was in certain older shmups. If you died, the difficulty level in some games would lower itself invisibly in the background to give the player a better chance of going forward. The only thing people could use to tell that the difficulty had been lowered artificially behind the scenes would be in the score. It wouldn't make people feel bad about their skills not being as good as another, but still reward those who tried hard and make it visible in the rankings. I can't remember which franchises did that. I believe some shmups developed by Compile did that to some extent. Gradius is at the other end of the spectrum. You die, and it can be even harder to continue playing due to starting again with little to none of the much necessary arsenal you would need to make progress.

Cubed3 Limited Staff :: Review and Feature Writer

Resi 4 also did that, Rudy -

Very, very cool stuff.

Disagree with the article, also. I will never understand why people care about the options available to other players and how they choose to play their games. I am someone that fucking loves video games, but you know what? I don't so much care for trying to be good at 99% of them. I am a different person to when I was in my mid teens, and through a combination of not having as much time, not being bothered, and now caring more about experiencing the actual stories than the gameplay in many games I'm interested in today, I quite often choose to play on the easiest settings if they're available. There are exceptions - plenty - but with such a backlog of games that I just want to experience the story of most of all, easy mode is the answer for me.

If easy mode didn't exist in many of the games I've played, I would have missed out on some fantastic stories and games. And besides - who is to say I cannot have a shit load of fun playing on the easiest setting with helping hands? Just because it's deemed "easy" doesn't mean it may not prove challenging to me, and may be more fun than if I was playing on normal or hard modes. Hard modes aren't actually fun for most people.

Is the argument that beating a game above the easiest mode available should have exclusive unlockables that can't be gained by beating it on the easiest mode? I am fine with cool stuff being locked behind harder difficulties, but it shouldn't be a problem that no reward exists, no matter what mode is beaten. I find it odd that just because an easier way to beat FF9 now exists, you feel like beating it the normal way is rendered pointless. I've said plenty of times here and elsewhere that me now having the option to beat games in easier ways (games I've beaten the normal way, and defeated all superbosses in, and basically got 100% in numerous times, by the way) is the reason I've picked up FF7 on PS4 and FF9 on PC. For me personally, in the state of mind I am in in terms of how I prefer to play many of my games today, these are fantastic additions to the games, and it affects absolutely nobody else because they have the option of beating the game the normal way, too. Nothing is removed, only added.

I am fine with games being hard for the sake of it. Games designed around that are great. Let's have more of them, sure. But complaining about easy modes and stuff being added to games is silly to me. Let people enjoy them how they want without feeling inferior because they play on easier modes.

Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic

If you are a registered member and logged in, you can also subscribe to topics by email.
Sign up today for blogs, games collections, reader reviews and much more
Site Feed
Who's Online?
Steven M

There are 1 members online at the moment.